The applying of social innovation in healthcare: a scoping evaluation | Infectious Illnesses of Poverty


Overview of research included

A complete of 27 research met the eligibility standards and had been included within the scoping evaluation (Fig. 3). Nearly all of articles (21/27) had been revealed between 2015 and 2020. Half (14/27) had been revealed in health-specific journals and the remaining half in a spread of different disciplines together with administration and enterprise research and programme, coverage and planning research, innovation and informatics, and agriculture. The most typical strategies had been case research (14/27), and scoping, systematic and normal literature evaluations (4/27). The literature was dominated by analysis originating from high-income nation contexts, notably in Europe. 9 revealed research had been carried out in low-income, low-middle revenue or upper-middle international locations (two in Africa; 4 in Asia; three in Latin America). Low-income nation researchers (first creator) and establishments had been under-represented within the pattern, restricted to solely three representing establishments in Colombia, Uganda and India.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Literature search and evaluation course of


Social innovation has been utilized to a wide range of illness focus areas and to satisfy public well being coverage goals (Desk 2). Social improvements in low- and middle-income international locations (LMICs), 3/27 research, targeted on infectious illnesses, focusing on prevention and entry to companies for malaria, HIV and Chagas illness [61,62,63,64]. A second focus of social improvements in LMICs, 9/27 research, was to attain fairness in entry to care and this included ladies’s well being points and social determinants of well being similar to poverty, rurality, and infrastructure (primary sanitation) [61, 64, 65]. These focus areas had been consistent with each nationwide well being agendas in addition to world agendas as set by the Millennium and Sustainable Growth Objectives. The literature from high-income international locations describes a distinct utility of social innovation by way of illness focus and public well being goals. Many European international locations have adopted social innovation to handle welfare state failures, notably associated to the shortcoming of governments to maintain rising well being expenditures for ageing populations [66,67,68,69,70,71,72]. On this context, social improvements have additionally been developed in response to coverage goals regarding public participation in well being, usually as a secondary technique to maneuver the burden of care from the state to people and different actors by social enterprise [71, 73,74,75]. As this means, social innovation is often utilized to handle well being system failures. Kreitzer et al. [76], for instance, explored the Buurtzorg (Neighbourhood Care) Mannequin within the Netherlands, designed to beat vertical service supply, low well being employee satisfaction, and burdensome bureaucratic processes of care. De Freitas et al. [73] presents a participatory course of involving households of sufferers affected by congenital problems within the design interventions in areas the place well being techniques responsiveness is poor, and Windrum et al. [77] presents the case of making a standardised diabetes prevention and administration programme based mostly on patient-centred rules. This programme led to the reform of care provision throughout a number of international locations.

Desk 2 Social innovation problem focus

Kind and performance

The classification of social improvements was problematic due to their divergent operational definitions. Two articles offered a proposed typology for social improvements in well being. Mason et al. [66] proposed 4 varieties of social improvements in well being fairness: as social actions; companies; social enterprises; and digital merchandise. Farmer et al. [74] proposed a typology developed by frontline suppliers to advertise youngster dental well being as: extending present practices; creating cheaper variations of present merchandise; adapting present practices in several contexts or follow areas; and translating concepts instantly from proof. From these instances research of particular social improvements, nonetheless, the proposed typologies proved too slim or restrictive as classification constructions. The case research fell into two purposeful classes, with social innovation handled both as a course of or an final result.

4 research targeted on social innovation as a course of. These research employed participatory mechanisms to help the event of recent options to native challenges. The aim in all instances was to reinforce affected person or public participation in well being care and improve social relationships. Collaborative workshops occurred within the type of design sprints, co-design processes and suppose tank methodologies [73, 74, 81]. All these workshops had been led by skilled facilitators who had been described as being ‘bricoleurs’, offering inspiration to individuals, defending the improvements, and linking them to sources. Srinivas [63], for instance, introduced a case that used crowdsourcing contests to provide males who’ve intercourse with males the chance to design well being promotional materials to encourage different males to check for HIV.

The place social improvements had been described as an final result, fashions included totally different elements (companies, merchandise, processes, social actions) and supply in several settings. Neither single element of the mannequin was notably distinctive, however the mixture or ‘bricolage’ of those elements resulted in innovation. Three varieties of fashions had been recognized: care fashions (6/27 research); social community/connection fashions (3/27 research); and entrepreneurial fashions (2/27 research) (Desk 3). These fashions might or might not have a digital element or a monetary element. Innovation in care fashions concerned the re-organisation of care processes, together with how companies had been delivered, usually transferring facility-based companies instantly into the neighborhood, with the function and scope of suppliers modified to provide extra autonomy or enable for task-shifting to non-health professionals [63, 70, 76, 77, 80, 86]. These care fashions reported optimistic outcomes on extending entry to well being companies, enhancing affordability and bettering effectiveness on illness or wellbeing indicators. The modern side of social community fashions had been the connections and relationships fostered between totally different actors and sectors [79, 84, 87]. Digital merchandise similar to cellular apps or on-line web sites had been leveraged to facilitate connections between actors. The outcomes of those fashions included optimistic behavioural change, constructing neighborhood social capital, and enhancing ladies’s participation and roles. The innovation throughout the entrepreneurial fashions had been mechanisms to scale back prices of companies [72, 82], whereas additionally bettering entry to companies and creating new employment alternatives.

Desk 3 Social innovation as an final result


Within the literature, creators of social innovation can function both as people or as collectives, the latter together with citizen actions, cross-disciplinary collaborative actor groups and establishments. The traits of particular person social innovators in well being usually are not properly described, however three case research supply perception into the function of non-public expertise, hardship or problem, or of a neighborhood taking part in a big contribution within the innovator’s work. Among the many indigenous Maori inhabitants of New Zealand, improvements can usually be constrained by tradition and place, particularly when diverted from acceptable mainstream western approaches [80]. Nevertheless, social innovators in well being used cultural, social and place-based capital to create options to serve their very own communities [65, 80, 86]. In every case, neighborhood belief within the innovation was crucial to its success.

The collective creation of social innovation in well being (8/27 research), both in cross-disciplinary actor groups or networks, has obtained higher consideration. Firstly, the social innovation improvement course of is used to beat the siloed nature of well being and to foster higher interdisciplinarity and intersectionality [61, 62, 66, 67, 69, 81, 82, 87]. That is notably properly illustrated in relation to Chagas illness in Guatemala, the place innovation in interventions concerned collaboration from epidemiology, biology, anthropology, sociology, engineering and structure, and numerous funding businesses, worldwide non-governmental organisations, authorities and universities [61]. The good thing about groups and collective networks is their capability to maneuver past boundaries and draw on collective cognition, capital, and the pooling and complementarity of capabilities [67].

Inside these groups, alternative was created for the participation of non-expert actors. As described in these articles [61, 74, 81], the worth of social innovation from a public well being coverage perspective is the chance it affords much less highly effective actors (sufferers, households, beneficiaries, neighborhood members) to contribute to new well being options, drawing on experiential data and private data that may meaningfully contribute to and complement skilled or tutorial data. Making use of social innovation as a course of in itself results in new types of energy relations and empowerment. The participation of actors in resolution creation in some instances has translated into neighborhood motion, however little past anecdotal proof is introduced within the well being literature of sustained intervention success or actor empowerment [61, 73, 74]. Case research from the administration and improvement literature (3/27 research) present extra depth and longitudinal proof to substantiate the extent to which communities might be empowered, guaranteeing that self-governance and neighborhood autonomy of initiatives are achieved. The Kerala Palliative Care mannequin, for instance, has scaled far past its preliminary locus of implementation. From 1995 to 2012, 230 neighborhood organisations and 26 000 social activists turned concerned within the supply of home-based companies to 70 000 sufferers on the finish of life [86]. The Graham Vikas social innovation in India additionally illustrates that the core to its method is a hundred percent inclusion of members of the neighborhood, notably ladies’s involvement in all decision-making processes. As a place to begin, this system established a consultant committee in every village, and a sustainability fund into which neighborhood members contributed, in accordance with their means, to co-fund the work. All through challenge implementation, coaching was delivered on management, accounting and different operational procedures to make sure the neighborhood can totally handle the initiative independently [65]. One other instance, the Enterprise-in-a-Field initiative in Pakistan, illustrates how adopting a micro-entrepreneurship method to extending entry to contraception can empower ladies to turn into self-employed revenue mills whereas assembly their well being wants [82].

Along with embedding social improvements instantly into communities, institutionalised actor networks can work to make sure sustainability. One mannequin which has efficiently embedded an initiative throughout a number of institutional ranges is the Therapeutic Affected person Schooling Mannequin for Diabetes [77] in Austria. This case demonstrates the significance of social improvements partaking in institutional and political work with present skilled our bodies at native and worldwide ranges, whereas creating new skilled our bodies to help its translation from analysis, its diffusion and its sustainability.

In abstract, no class of actor is excluded from social innovation, no matter his/her background, organisational affiliation or hierarchical stage. Throughout the literature, social innovation is seen as a democratising catalyst for well being, enabling broad-based sectoral motion, inclusion of marginalised people (together with ladies) and offering communities with alternatives for motion.


To look at the rules and values upon which social improvements are based mostly, articles had been sub-classified in accordance with the social innovation paradigm to which they ascribed. As illustrated above (Fig. 1), three essential paradigms, nested inside one another, exist: the instrumental or technocratic paradigm that accounts for social inclusion within the creation of recent options; the democratic paradigm that accounts for the empowerment of actors by social innovation; and the institutional or structural paradigm that accounts for modifications inside present establishments and techniques. Nearly all of articles (16/27) upheld the instrumental or technocratic paradigm wherein context social innovation was thought to be an answer to handle challenges, and occurred by participatory processes that promoted the social inclusion of various actors. Though encouraging engagement in social innovation, this paradigm doesn’t differ vastly from different approaches to public or affected person participation and participatory governance in public well being and improvement. These options supply improved methods to make sure higher effectiveness or effectivity, however don’t remodel relations or constructions. These articles originate primarily from Europe, the place the method to social innovation has been influenced by the European Fee’s inclusion of the precept into coverage with neoliberal agendas [45].

A second however smaller variety of articles (8/27) have interaction with empowerment. These transcend giving actors a voice or alternative to offer enter by session, and supply them with the chance to take management. By constructing the capability of marginalised or under-represented actors, they develop an enhanced stage of company and motion which suggests a change in energy relations taking impact. Many larger-scale social innovation care fashions had people-centredness as a core organising precept [76, 80, 82]. Fashions had been designed to contain not solely the affected person or the beneficiary on the well being centre, but in addition well being staff. The Buurtzog Neighbourhood Care mannequin, for instance, illustrated how, by enhancing affected person and supplier (nurse) autonomy, higher outcomes in care provision had been achieved and supplier motivation and satisfaction had been enhanced [76]. The iMOKO (New Zealand) and Enterprise-in-a-Field (Pakistan) instances each illustrate empowerment of the area people by inserting entry to healthcare within the palms of trusted neighborhood members similar to lecturers, and by giving ladies in the neighborhood alternatives for revenue technology [80, 82]. The Time Financial institution mannequin ascribed dignity and price to the life of every individual, and this highlighted the worth of neighborhood members as lively individuals in healthcare: “The primary core worth of the Time Financial institution operations is asset, one thing of worth to share with another person … nobody is nugatory on the planet … everyone seems to be a contributor to society in his or her personal approach” [84]. Social improvements present how trusted neighborhood members similar to lecturers can play an important function in selling well being and entry to companies; how ladies can play a job within the supply of well being merchandise whereas being lifted from poverty by revenue producing alternatives; and the way aged folks might be each customers and suppliers of companies [61, 62, 76, 80, 82, 84, 87].

The third and smallest variety of articles (4/27) ascribed and recognised the systemic or structural paradigm of social innovation, and within the analysis, assessed the modifications and dynamics that occurred at an institutional stage. The analysis carried out by Vijay and Monin [86] in India adopted an institutional perspective to look at how sure contexts are extra ‘poised’—receptive and prepared—for social improvements. In addition they examined how actors, working as institutional entrepreneurs, exercised company to play an necessary function to extend the readiness of particular context to innovation and overcome the perceived resistance of present establishments and constructions. The Kerala Palliative Care mannequin demonstrated giant scale institutional change because it reframed palliative care provision from a medical body to a social justice body, with knowledgeable hospice or hospital mannequin changed by the bottom-up organisation of companies delivered primarily by neighborhood volunteers. The Therapeutic Affected person Schooling Mannequin for Diabetes revealed that, on the core of this initiative, techniques stage change was achieved by the institutional work of actors from nationwide skilled associations. They labored to embed the mannequin into present establishments (e.g. medical insurance funds), whereas they created new establishments (new skilled our bodies) to make sure that new norms, values and practices had been embedded at a techniques stage. Windrum et al. [77] recognised the potential of a mannequin of affected person centred care as having the potential of democratising drugs.

Lastly, analysis carried out by Pless and Appel [65] illustrated how social improvements can remodel the norms, values, perceptions and roles inside social establishments at neighborhood stage by a number of approaches: the entire inclusion of all neighborhood members; the institution of self-governing neighborhood constructions; the availability of expertise constructing; and repair supply. The challenge positioned neighborhood members within the function of shoppers, in order that challenge workers solely acted upon neighborhood request. The long-term dedication (> 20 years) of this social innovation ensured that the end result of an equitable and social society was achievable. This innovation recognised well being as an final result of sustainable improvement.

Facilitators and obstacles

As a remaining a part of the framework evaluation, the facilitators and obstacles of social improvements had been thought-about which can be related at totally different phases of the social innovation life cycle (Desk 4). There have been a number of commonalities throughout the literature by way of enablers for concept improvement and implementation together with: making a protected, protecting and facilitated atmosphere; the democratic sharing of data; the significance of timing and context; and implementing self-governance constructions to help ongoing implementation and sustainability. Transferring past the innovation locus to have interaction extra broadly with companions and the prevailing system influenced innovation switch, diffusion and scale. Solely two research—Therapeutic Affected person Schooling Mannequin and the Kerala Group Palliative Care mannequin—described the method of institutionalising a social innovation [77, 86]. In each instances, a transparent strategic method was adopted by the innovators and implementers to exchange prior institutional logics with new logics. This entailed deep contextual consciousness and engagement in several types of institutional work: advocacy to help motion constructing; finding the problem in an ethical or social justice body; partaking present establishments and creating new ones; and investing within the training of these concerned within the innovation, each to realize legitimacy and be certain that requirements might be maintained. Each of those social improvements have confirmed sustainable, and as fashions, they’ve been scaled to totally different settings and international locations (Austria and India). Limitations negatively affecting throughout the varied phases of social innovation improvement included price issues and useful resource constraints, a unreceptive or altering political context, restricted proof of effectiveness and implementer attitudes by way of low motivation and drive.

Desk 4 Enablers and obstacles


Supply hyperlink